TRANSLATION MENU: LOOK UPPER RIGHT BELOW THE SOCIAL MEDIA ICONS.

IT OFFERS EVERY LANGUAGE AVAILABLE AROUND THE WORLD!

ALSO, SOCIAL MEDIA AND PRINT ICONS ARE AT THE BOTTOM OF THIS POST!

Pictured above: Brett Redmayne-Titley on the left and yours truly on the right.

Sixteen years on the streets, living and working with the people of China, Jeff

For donations, print books, ebooks and audiobooks, please see at the bottom of this post.

Text and audiovisual.

Downloadable audio podcast at the bottom of this page, Brighteon, iVoox, RuVid, as well as being syndicated on iTunes, Stitcher Radio and Reason.fm (links below),

Brighteon Video Channel: https://www.brighteon.com/channels/jeffjbrown

Brighteon video. Be sure to subscribe while watching,

Audio (download at the bottom of this page),

Note before starting

It’s great to talk with Brett again. He is always passionate and informed about humanity’s zeigeist. There are not many journalists who are willing to engage in a conversation about Judaism, but like me, he never stops in his search for the truth. I hope you watch/listen/read our discussion, because the genocide in Palestine is model that is already starting in Syria, and will be expanded for the rest of the world’s 8.2 billion Goyim.

Brett Redmayne-Titley has spent the last decade travelling and documenting the “Sorrows of Empire.” He has authored over 200 articles all of which have been published and often republished and translated by news agencies worldwide. An archive of his many articles can be found at www.watchingromeburn.uk. He can be contacted at live-on-scene ((@)) gmx.com.

My Library on Judaism, which is essential to understand our interview,

Living library on Judaism. Continually updated. With image texts and video transcripts to easily copy for your use, and for translating them and this webpage in all available languages!

https://radiosinoland.com/2025/01/23/judaism/

Talking points

1- Defining Modern Zionism (A broader meaning of the virus that is infecting the world).

2- Correctly defining “Greater Israel” (bombs are not necessary in an already conquered World: from the UK to EU to Russia).

3- Zionism destroys its host (the social decay of America and the UK: a parallel).

4- Gaza the most accurate mirror of the Zionist threat (we are all Palestinians now).

5- America: Just another Israel with a bigger army (without America? Peace!).

Meeting summary

Quick recap

Brett and Jeff discussed Brett’s recent stay in New Orleans and Jeff’s trip to China, where they shared their experiences and plans for future travel. They explored various geopolitical topics including military technology, the conflict in Palestine, and the influence of Jewish elements on global affairs, while also discussing economic challenges facing Western countries. The conversation concluded with reflections on their professional relationship and commitment to independent journalism, along with discussions about historical revisionism and current political trends.

Summary

Brett’s Move and Future Plans

Brett and Jeff discussed Brett’s recent move from San Diego to New Orleans, where he arrived on Saturday. Brett expressed his preference for driving over flying due to the treatment he receives at airports. They briefly touched on Brett’s plans to discuss Zionism and Judaism.

Jeff’s China Travel Insights

Jeff shared his recent trip to China, describing it as an extraordinary experience with advanced infrastructure and clean environments. He mentioned his ongoing travel blog series, “Amir&Jeff’s Excellent China Adventure,” which includes geopolitical commentary. Brett expressed interest in joining Jeff on a future trip to China, as he would like to experience it firsthand and gain a better understanding of the country.

Global Hypersonic Technology Power Dynamics

Brett and Jeff discussed the current state of global military technology, particularly focusing on hypersonic weapons and their impact on military power dynamics. Brett highlighted how Western nations, including the US, are at a disadvantage due to their lack of hypersonic capabilities compared to Russia and China, noting that the US military budget is misallocated and ineffective. They also discussed the recent conflict in Palestine, where Brett claimed Iran demonstrated superior technological accuracy, and compared current geopolitical tensions to historical events like the rise of the Third Reich, suggesting concerning parallels with modern authoritarian trends in the US.

Concerns About the Jewish Shabbatist Movement

Brett discussed his concerns about Judaism, particularly the Shabbatist movement, which he believes is attempting to dominate political systems and circumvent the conscience of humanity. He explained how this movement, led by Rabbi Schneerson, has grown since 1963 and how it allows followers to be absolved of their crimes annually during Passover. Jeff shared his own research into Judaism and expressed concern about the future of humanity, mentioning his extensive library on the subject and his search for a new editor. Both agreed on the importance of raising awareness about these issues.

Jewish Influence on Global Affairs

Jeff and Brett discussed the influence of Jewish elements on global affairs, including control over industries like pornography, organ harvesting, and arms trafficking. Jeff said he wants nothing to do with a religion and people who appove of raping 3-year-old children. Brett emphasized the importance of maintaining a critical mind and the need to question societal issues, such as the war in Gaza and the control of politicians by Jewish interests. They also touched on the rise of billionaires, the impact of Jewish influence on American and European politics, and the need for public awakening to address these issues.

Global Economic and Political Shifts

Brett and Jeff discussed the economic and political challenges facing Western countries, particularly the impact of unregulated capitalism and the shift towards neoliberal policies since the 1980s. Brett highlighted the contrast between Eastern European countries, which maintained their own currencies and avoided massive IMF loans, and Western Europe’s reliance on the EU and IMF. They also discussed the decline of political capital in the U.S., comparing it to Lyndon Johnson’s ability to negotiate effectively, and the rise of nationalism in countries like Russia and China. The conversation touched on the role of Judaism in global politics and the negative perception of socialism in the U.S., contrasting it with successful socialist policies in countries like Norway and Denmark.

UK Social Services Under Scrutiny

Brett discussed the degradation of social services in the UK under Conservative leadership, highlighting examples like the privatized train system’s poor performance and Keir Starmer’s broken election promises. He expressed optimism about Jeremy Corbyn’s potential political resurgence due to public disillusionment with mainstream politicians. Brett also shared insights on historical revisionism, particularly David Irving’s work on World War II, and criticized the demonization of Hitler while downplaying Himmler’s role. The conversation concluded with reflections on the current state of American politics and the potential for societal unrest.

Reflecting on Independent Journalism Collaboration

Jeff and Brett reflected on their long-standing professional relationship, which began in 2020 when Brett wrote an article about the 2020 election fraud. They discussed their shared commitment to producing substantiated work and the challenges of being independent journalists. Brett emphasized the importance of challenging ideas and encouraging critical thinking among readers. They agreed to stay in touch and potentially collaborate on future projects.

Transcript

Jeff: Yeah, you sound great.

Brett:  Thanks, I appreciate that. You’re looking good, too.

Jeff: Where are you?

Brett:  I’m in New Orleans.

Jeff: Oh, NOLA. Okay.

Brett:  Yeah, I came here. I love music; I’m a huge music fan. And New Orleans is a cultural experience. And I’m sure you mentioned you have a friend here, and that’s why I came. In America, there’s not a lot of cultural experience left, but we do seem to have a little bit of that down here in New Orleans, so we’re glad of that.

Jeff: How long have you been there?

Brett:  I got here Saturday. I drove out from San Diego. I’m not much for flying anymore; the way they treat you is a little hard to take, so I’d rather just take a nice long drive than jump on an airplane, quite frankly.

Jeff: Did you do what? Was that Highway five? Interstate five?

Brett:  No, it’s pretty much the ten from San Diego damn near all the way.

Jeff: Oh, that’s right, it’s further south. Okay.

Brett:  Yeah.

Jeff: That’s cool.

Brett:  Would you just turn up your volume? I’m all the way up as loud as I can go right now.

Jeff: You know, people have been saying this, and I… hang on just a second. Oh, master volume, hang on. And it’s the master volume control. Well, let me try this, since we’re not in any big rush, volume master. But that extension.

Brett:  Let me see if I can turn up mine. I thought I had it all the way up, but I’ll just check real quick here, just in case.

Jeff: Volume master. Let me see it. Hang on just a second. Is that louder now?

Brett:  Yeah, that is a little louder. Yeah.

Jeff: I’ve got it up to 600%. I don’t know what else to do.

Brett:  Okay, that’s pretty good. I’m just checking my end, too, just in case I’m screwing up here.

Jeff: I’ll try to settle this up.

Brett:  I’ll say it’s not the best.

Jeff: It comes and goes. And it’s my Logitech camera, and I really don’t have €100 right now to go out and buy a new one, so I’m trying.

Brett:  Yeah, well, we can make do. I mean, I can hear you. You’re just not super loud, so I just have to open my ears a little bit.

Jeff: Oh, wait. That’s the best I can do. I’ll try to sit a little bit closer. How’s that?

Brett:  Yeah, that’s pretty good. I’m just checking my end. For some reason, my laptop’s been super slow right now, and it has to be expected when you’re in need of it to work properly.

Jeff: All right.

Brett:  Yeah. How was your trip to China? That sounds like a fantastic trip.

Jeff: Yeah, I’ve been doing these posts called “Amir and Jeff’s Excellent China Adventure.” I don’t know if you’ve seen any of them, and if not, I’ll send you the link after the show, and they’re just… it was amazing. I mean, it’s indescribable. In fact, in my last post, I said, “China can no longer claim to be a developing country.” I mean, they have drilled infrastructure down to the tiniest hamlet, and it’s mind-boggling to see. And it’s absolutely spotless. It’s cleaner than Singapore. And it’s just that the infrastructure is everywhere, the people have changed since the criminal 80s and 90s, the Deng Xiaoping era. And it’s just that the people are just incredibly nice and helpful, just like they are here in Taiwan Province.

Brett:  Sure.

Jeff: And it’s so easy, and it’s so relaxing, and it’s so safe, and there’s no knives, and there’s no school shootings like yesterday in Minneapolis.

Brett:  Oh, God. And what can you say? You know, it’s a society that has a future, which is anathema to America and in the West, which is just dying left and right. I mean, they’ve used up their resources, they’ve used up their infrastructure. They’re morally bankrupt and corrupt. They’re following… We’ll get into that shortly. But yeah, one thing I would say to you, Jeff, is if you ever do a trip to China, I’d love to go along with you. I mean, I’ll pay my own way and all that kind of stuff. It would just be nice to have someone to go with or a junket to go along with and see all of that. I’m open-minded, as you know, there’s so much miscommunication about China, and I’d like to see it with my own eyes as well. I might have told you I had only one experience. I was in Guangzhou.

I was laid over, like, forever. And for some reason, the hotel they put us up… I was outside of the airport. They’re normally on the airport, you know. So they actually took us to Guangzhou. And I think I was supposed to do this, but me and this Filipino guy said, “Hey, man, I’m going out the back door.” I said, “I’m going to go check this out, I don’t care.” I said, “The worst thing to do is make us come back, you know?” Well, not everything went well. We had a lovely walk all over Guangzhou and had a lovely meal. There was zero English. I mean, absolutely zero on that. But no, I’m a big, tall guy. I’m six four. So I stand out like a big, tall white guy. People were literally pointing, and I was walking down the street because I wasn’t supposed to be there, you know? But anyway, no, I had a nice experience, but it was a very cursory experience, you know? And I’d like to go further.

Jeff: Well, if Amir and I are talking about doing something, you know that this is a series. So if you’d like to join us next summer because he teaches. He’s a professor at Hunan Normal University in Changsha. And so he gets off in the summer. So that’s why we took off from July 7th until August, until about August 4th. And it was amazing. I’ll send you the links, and you can take a look. We’ve done 27 posts, and they’re mostly audio and visual, videos and photos, and a lot of commentary, a lot of geopolitical commentary, political commentary. So it’s kind of like my first book, *44 Days Backpacking in China*. It’s a travelog, but it’s got a real strong backbone of politics and geopolitics.

Brett:  Sure. Yeah, well, my enthusiasm for the West is really waning. There’s really nothing exciting going on in the West unless you like watching Rome burn. Yeah, that’s all that’s left. It’s really sad, but you know, without going into too much individual, you know, minutiae of this whole thing. Yeah, you have the polarity of one half of the world is dying and the other half is growing, and the part that’s dying is really upset at the part that’s growing and wants to demonize the other side, if not come up with a rationale to start a war. I think the Americans would be… well, put it this way. The Chinese are very, very pragmatic in the way they view everything, especially war.

If they were to go to war with the Americans, it wouldn’t last 48 hours, you know? I mean, it would be just destruction. One of the things that we’re finding very quickly is that the West doesn’t have hypersonics, and they’re at a huge disadvantage on that right now, as we saw in Israel, etc. You might have followed the story about 3 years ago, where the Russians sailed their warship right up to the territorial waters of America and just sat there for about 3 days, going back and forth. And it was a signal, basically, what are you going to do about it? You know, they could defend the battleships if they absolutely had to.

They could fire hypersonics from 200 miles from New York, you know, and what’s the Americans gonna do about it? Because everything they’ve got is so damn slow that it can be intercepted. You know, so the hypersonics are a huge game changer. The RSnick from Russia is just amazing, and they’re moving into Model 3 and Model 4 on that. So the American military might is really a misnomer because America has wasted so many of its resources artificially on its military without joining the military race, if you will, the technological race, such as hypersonics and many others. I mean, if you look at the F-35, it’s just a joke. You look at the Su-57? Yeah.

I’d like to have a fleet of those, you know. So there you are. As you’re probably aware, recently the Chinese decoded the F-25 signal. You know, that’s huge, because that was the masking technique which did make the F-25 invisible, I mean, up to the point of contact. But the Chinese, their substantial reports have decoded that now, so the F-25 has lost its complete effectiveness. It is now just another plane on a radar. And I would presume they’ve shared that with the Russians as well. So the Americans keep going backwards, and it’s the arrogance of it. I mean, the military budget just went up $100 billion.

You know, the full breadth of the educational budget is $60 billion. And where’s it going? It’s completely wasted, and they can rush their hypersonics to reduction if they try, but they’re in a 5- to 7-year program just to try to catch up with the Russians and the Chinese, who also have hypersonics. Obviously, Iran does as well. India has them. So it’s a real game changer here, as far as things like battleships and Aircraft carriers, as you’re well aware, you can tell when the war’s about to kick off, because that’s the first thing they do is they take the battleships out of range, basically. Well, the range is pretty big for the hypersonics, but they’ll be at the bottom of the ocean very, very quickly.

Because if you saw the targeting in Israel, you know, as much as the Americans wanted to play that down, the accuracy was amazing, making it sound like the Iranians had missed their target. Oh, no, they didn’t. You hit the spot on the money, and if it hadn’t been for the Americans and Trump, Israel would have been in a shambles, because Iran had substantial reserves left, and as you know, Israel was running out of defensive missiles very, very quickly. So, it was all a theater of the absurd towards the end, and the Iranians were part of that, but as far as who technologically won that war, I would say the Iranians did easily.

Jeff: Oh, yeah, absolutely. Well, they were so accurate that there was a military hospital. You know, they had two, like, Mossad intelligence buildings to the left and to the right. And they took out those two buildings, completely wiped them out. And it blew out windows and stuff in the hospital, and of course, they tried to make it… they can probably claim that it was the hospital that was hit. But it wasn’t hit. They were so accurate, it just blew the windows out like across the street. And they took out these two buildings. It’s just unbelievable.

Brett: Yeah, the West made it sound like they missed their target. No, right next door was what they were after, you know? I mean, they got the Mossad headquarters dead center; it’s not there anymore. And the same was true with what the Israelis were doing. They were trying to get high-visualization targets. The target that have a lot of… Oh, I don’t know what the word I’m looking for is, but they’re important targets, they get a lot of press, if you will, you know.

Jeff: Yeah.

Brett: But once again, the Israelis were about to run out of defensive missiles and be completely at the mercy of the Iranians. And then Trump and his nonsense, I mean, getting on… you probably saw it when he… that short, you know. It wasn’t a press conference, but he addressed the nation. “We’ve obliterated Iran’s nuclear technology,” which was ridiculous, because already most of us know that he didn’t, you know? And now experts talk about this fired the general that came out with the report, and this is now Trump in a nutshell, if you don’t like the message, shoot the messenger, no matter how true it is.

I mean, you won’t even trust his own Intelligence department anymore, much less economists and everything else, so it’s very interesting, because I’m sure you read *Rise and Fall of the Third Reich*, which is sort of the preeminent Second World War book by William Shirer. It’s been vilified for a lot of great reasons. However, I would say that David Irving’s book, *Hitler’s Diary*, is far and away much, much better. However, if you read Shirer’s book, which has been around since 1963, the first two… it’s a chronology, and it goes back to about just post-Versailles, basically, which was the advent of Hitler.

You know, as a reaction to the Rezai Treaty, which did a lot of… well, it put Germany at a disadvantage again, deliberately, because of the First World War. But Hitler used as a springboard for nationalism. What’s interesting is that if you read the first 200 or 300 pages before about 1936, which was really the development of the Second World War. The parallels to that and what’s going on in America right now are absolutely extraordinary. They’re very, very close. And I encourage a lot of people to read the book or just read the first couple of hundred pages, because that alone should be waiting for concern because we are seeing this increase in basically… I don’t know if it’s Nazism, but it certainly is authoritarianism.

You mentioned Palantir to me. I’m well aware that. Trump has just authored, what was it, $500 million, basically, to track everything that all Americans are doing, yet he wants to say that he’s pro-American. Not at all. And I think what he’s done to himself is a disservice, because in that, you know, the national address that he did. He finishes up by saying, “God bless America, and God bless Israel.” Well, that’s just fundamentally incorrect, because the Israelis don’t believe in a God; they worship the devil. If you get into the Torah and the Talmud, you know, there are many famous quotes from Jesus Christ, and I’m sort of a-religious, I’m Daoist, but I do know a little bit about religion, very close is, you know, taking you from the temple, “Ye are of the devil,” and that is very true.

Their mysticism is not based on an individual. It’s not based on a god, necessarily, an individual god. Whether you believe in that or not, their religion is very, very different, and as such, they’re trying to dominate the conscience of America, and the conscience of the world, and that’s what I get very concerned about. You’ve read my work, and I talk about the constant of conscience, which I believe is part of the DNA of the human spirit. And as such, they’re trying to change that. You know, they combine off all the politicians they want and keep their genocide going in the face of massive, you know, public opinion to the contrary. However, they can only go as far as the politicians.

They’re not going to go as far as the constant of conscience. It circumvents all religions with the exception of Judaism, it seems. Although in fairness, you have to look at what is taking place worldwide with a worldwide Jewry, because the subject of Zionism is not mutually exclusive to Judaism at all. It’s a subset of the whole. And as you read in my previous article, I talked about Revi Schneerson and the Shabbatist movement, which started under Schneerson in 1963. What was also very interesting, in approximately 1963, with the advent of Schneerson, was the return of the Jewish prayer, called Nedri.

If you follow what’s taken place with the Kalnidri over the last 2,000 years, it’s basically synonymous with Zionism, the attempted control of political systems that their host had and allowed the Jews to come in, and then the Zionist elements, and I’m careful to say it that way, because in my view, Zionism is a much bigger definition. And it is sort of peculiar to those members of Judaism that go beyond the tenets, the normal tenets of Judaism, and go into domination, you know, the subject of greater Israel, which is a big subject. But the Kol Nidrei has been cast out formally multiple times over the last 2,000 years.

There were actually ecclesiastical conventions, where some of the religious figures of the time actually met in closed conference, and of course, what they said when they cast it out was, to paraphrase, “How can you have a religion that doesn’t believe in right versus wrong?” Because what the Kol Nidrei allows people of the… or the ciabatta’s faith, or the Zionist faith to do, is to be absolved of their crimes over the last year. It’s said every year at Passover. And it’s said incrementally, but only in the Shabbatist movement. See, that’s the thing, there are a lot of Jews who still would not subscribe to the Kol Nidrei. However, in the Shabbatist movement, as I said, in 1963, Schneerson brought that to bear, and it’s interesting, because Schneerson started in an educational position which was somewhat commendable.

What he wanted to do was just take worldwide Judaism worldwide into the schools, and that was the original position of the Shabbatist movement. However, as is typical kind of with, you know, looking at the bigger picture as a worldwide Jewry has done. They went to the next level. So as they went to other countries to propagate the education, they then immediately went after the political system for control. Now, that starts in 1963. Let’s fast forward 55 years, or what have you, to now, and you see this massive control worldwide. And this is coming through the Sabbath, and they’re particularly pernicious because they believe that Schneerson, when he comes back… he’s dead, he’s been dead since 63… or 1993.

He’s buried in a cemetery in Queens, New York. And just like going to the Wailing Wall, it is now de rigueur for upcoming politicians to go and basically kneel at Schneerson’s grave and certify their willingness to adjust their conscience towards the Shabbatist movement and the Kol Nidrei, and the Zionists. Now, once again, many Jews don’t believe in that. They think it’s abhorrent, but sadly, within the Zionist movement, this is part and parcel of what’s taking place.

And within that is the wholesale casting out of conscience, the right versus wrong, because once a year, they can be absolved of the various things that they’ve done wrong, whether it’s breaking contracts, or breaking a promise, or doing whatever, I suppose offering a genocide in Gaza can be just swept away at the next opportunity at Passover. So, this is what I think the public doesn’t understand in terms of the real threat that subset of Judaism which is predominant right now, because the rest of Judaism worldwide has not attempted to take over all the politicians. They’ve tried to live somewhat humbly within the context of the other religions. The Sabbaths are vehemently anti-alternate religions, and they make that very, very clear.

I mean, they are the chosen ones. They do believe in this, and I think if there’s anything that’s come good out of the Gaza issue, if there is anything at all, is it the awakening of the public about Judaism, about Zionism, about the Shabbatist movement, about Schneerson, etc., and realizing that that subset is abhorrent to the whole population of the world, or I know that you have leanings toward communism and all that, but that doesn’t take away your moral compunction, you know, to do right versus wrong. But for some strange reason, the Zionists feel that they can just sweep this under the rug and move forward.

Jeff: Thank you for that. I learned some stuff there. I really appreciate it. Last year, for 6 months… Well, actually, this year, I started in late 2024, I began studying Judaism, and I was really, really, really shocked and disgusted about what I learned. And I was very, very concerned about humanity’s future because these guys are running the show, and I created a Judaism library. Well, it’s quite extensive. It’s a hundred and something pages, and there’s a ton of stuff more to add, but my Pakistani editor wants to bow out, and he’s got a new job, and wants to move on, so I’m looking for a new editor to help me keep expanding it. But the one that just really, you know, to me, sums up everything is that rabbis are talking about how they can have sex with a 3-year-old girl, and it’s permitted. Yeah.

Brett: And if we demonize that, we’re anti-Semites. This broad race of anti-Semitism is just ridiculous when applied to morality.

Jeff: And why would I want to associate with any group of people that validates raping children? I mean, and it just goes on and on and on. I mean, they control the porn industry. They control the organ harvesting industry. They control the illegal arms. They control the global prostitution, Human trafficking. I mean, it’s frightening. They’re in control, baby. They’ve got the media, and they’ve got the banks, and that’s all you need.

Brett: They don’t have our minds, and that is the… you probably saw my article about 2 years ago, where I titled it “The War for Your Mind.”

Jeff: Yeah, I remember reading that one.

Brett: I included a little snippet from *1984*, which is the moment by which Winston has his epiphany, and the epiphany is that he just doesn’t know anymore, and then, of course, it’s Richard Burton is who plays the antagonist in that, says, better, you know? You know, because he’s been trying to get that epiphany out of Winston. And that’s what they’re trying to get out of us right now. They want us to acquiesce to our conscience and our mind, because we’re not allowed to say anything, because whatever they do is okay, and if we criticize it at all, it’s anti-Semitism. Now, that, of course, is breaking down dramatically. This is one of the results of what’s going on in Gaza.

People are no longer as receptive to this. Now, the politicians, of course, are, and don’t get me started on America. Paul Craig Roberts uses the term “insouciant,” which I think is a perfect way to describe the American public. Because we’re seeing massive protests around the world. There was one in London recently, and there was a huge one down in London. Assange actually led it. And it caused Albanese the next day to have to say that they’re tentatively going to certify Palestine. Okay, that’s great, that’s Albany trying to save in the face of popular opinion. But that popular opinion is there, and it can be brought to bear, and we’re seeing this. Even Starmer in the UK is having to placate the public.

I don’t think he’s doing much tangibly to take care of the issues, but verbally, he’s trying to placate the public, because how long can this go against the constant of conscience? It just can’t go on forever; the EU or the UK is probably the worst of the examples, because Starmer has literally made legislation whereby, if I use the term “genocide,” I get arrested. You know, if I put a Palestinian flag on my house, as you probably would, I have a house in Wales. If I put one of those in my house, I will be accosted, and I will be arrested, you know? Well, okay, that’s all bad, but what’s worse is the connection that people make to why? Why is that taking place? Well, there’s only one answer is the control of the politicians by the Zionist elements of Jewry. That’s it in a nutshell.

But it then goes further than that, because people have to ask themselves, well, what about COVID, you know? What about the economy? You know, what about military expenditures? You know, the list goes on and on, because as you know from my work, I hold Zionism to be a much more expansive definition than its originality definition under Theodor Herzl in 19… I mean, 1896 or whatever, when Zionism was really just the quest for an Israeli nation, which they got in 1946 through UN Resolution 1942. Now, that’s all well and good, and I think some people were willing to accept that a worldwide Jewry needed to have a home, but it never stopped there.

It gave them a base of operations, which is what it did, and that base of operations has now transcended itself into the political realm and the societal realms across the board. You know, at one point, it’s a story I’ve been trying to get out, but I started articulating the various facets in society that have been, if you will, infected by greed because Zionism is, as we discussed, an excuse for greed, you know, unabashed, unadulterated, unrestricted greed. But that greed goes so far beyond territorial issues. And now, obviously, in banking, we all know that, the banking interests are predominantly Jewish. That doesn’t necessarily mean they have to be demonized.

However, if you look at the results of, like, say, BlackRock, etc., and what they’re doing in Ukraine right now, I mean, they’re getting ready to start Israel, too in Ukraine. It’s circumstantial evidence at best; they’re not going to admit that, but as anyone who follows Judaism knows that the original Kazakhs were from the southern Ukraine area. That’s where they came from before they matriculated south, and then, ultimately, moved further and further south, and then suddenly they were given Israel. So they finished the plan, if you will, by going into Israel and making it larger and larger, and ignoring Ukraine.

However, Schneerson and others have said for the last 50 years that the goal is to return to the original homeland of the Jews, and they consider that to be basically in the Ukrainian area. Now, the borders have shifted many times over many, many years, so it’s not exactly Ukraine. However, the area that they considered to be the homeland of the original Jews is substantially within that region. And now you’re seeing things like Zelensky just wants to basically ruin the sperm population of the Ukrainian male; he’s sending everybody out there to be slaughtered. You know, they should have surrendered a long time ago, and it does beg the question, well, why haven’t they been?

Well, why haven’t they surrendered? He keeps throwing what little he has at this, at the behest of the Americans, because the Americans are still behind the scenes, I don’t care what Trump says, they’re still behind the scenes, they’re pulling Starmer’s strings, they’re pulling Schultz’s strings, etc. So it’s never going to stop. The trouble is that we as a people have to make it stop. And it’s becoming very, very difficult to accept this day after day, because the public has to rise up. You know, the subject of Greater Israel goes so far beyond Gaza, goes so far beyond Israel. And basically, when you look at America, why would you ever invade America like you would in Gaza?

You know, America is controlled by the Zionist elements already. Problem solved. This is very, very sad, but within what I said about the societal context of it all, within America, it’s just not the willingness to be apathetic about Gaza and anti-Semitism, or Semitism, or what have you. It’s the willingness to be silent about all the societal elements that are destroying America from within. Whether that be an increased military budget, or the continual cutting of any social services on the theory that suddenly trickle-down aeronautic economics is actually going to work. It will never work; it never has worked, that’s why they don’t use the term anymore.

It was coined under Reagan, and then the economy post-Reagan went into the toilet. And they don’t use the term of trickle-down economics any longer because it was properly vilified, and people remember that term and what it resulted in. So now they call it supply-side economics. There are a bunch of terms that they use to mask that. Well, that doesn’t take away the social degradation of America and Britain, because I live over there as well. Britain is very disenfranchised; the people are from their government. You know, they have really similar problems. I mean, they’ll fund Ukraine and not fund their own schools, you know. They’ve been trying to get the NHS privatized for years and years and years.

That’s slowed down because people like myself documented that, and the public became aware of the privatization of the NHS at the behest of the Americans. It’s basically another pool of money to go after. Zionism! Pull the money, let’s go get it. Let’s use the politicians to get it. Let’s put it in the bank. Let’s send it upstream where it’ll never come back down. And now that everything’s privatized, we can assume that we can make sure that that revenue stream continues to go to the powers that be up above, who are not going to give it back. A good example of that is that in 1983, there were only 5 billionaires in the world. It was the four walnut Heirs, and it was the Shah of Iran.

I mean, that’s gotta be 1980, though, because the Shah went out in ’79. So, anyway, there are only 5 billionaires in the world. There are over 6,000 now Billionaires, and a lot of them are multi-billionaires. Are they planning on giving that money back? Absolutely not. What they’re doing is buying politicians, they’re buying private armies, they’re divorcing themselves from society on private islands, you know, buying up entire city blocks so that they don’t have to deal with the public, and they’re sitting on their white clouds as if that’s okay. No, it’s not okay. You’ve destroyed society. The only reason these people are rich is because they game the system.

You know, a loose example would be, if they wanted to make raping 3-year-olds legal, okay, but are we going to allow it to be legal? Of course we’re not. We’re human beings, for God’s sakes, you know? We haven’t given up our minds. Now, have we been bought off? You know, am I a billionaire where I can hide on an island and divorce my mind from my own foibles? No, I’m not. But you would think that along the way, some people would, indeed, you know, show their moral compunction as a reaction to all this, but we’re not seeing much of that in the West right now.

Jeff: Yeah, I like to talk about how because I have French nationality and American nationality, I’ve spent years in France. It’s just as bad as in the UK, that’s now you can’t… Of course, every country in continental Europe. You can’t talk about the holohoax, and the fact that the Holocaust is not… as it is portrayed by Jewery, as you say, is not true. But you can’t talk about it. I think you can still talk about it in the United States and in England because there’s David Ikes (meant Irving), who I think lives in England, so apparently, it’s still okay to talk about it. And there are laws on the books now in France that if you criticize Israel, just like what they’re doing in the United States with Trump. If you criticize Israel, criticize Zionism, criticize Jews, 50,000 euro fines, 5 years in jail, and that kind of stuff.

Brett: Well, look what happened to CJ Hopkins in Germany. I mean, that’s ridiculous, just because his book cover had a Nazi swastika on it, which was kind of what Roger Waters did. He was using it for emphasis that we don’t want a return of the Nazi regime, you know? And the parallels there, they’re going after CJ with hammer and tongs now. In fact, he was… I think acquitted at one point, but now the chief prosecutor has dredged the whole thing back up again, presumably at a Jewish request, because they’re not going to let him off the hook, because it sends a signal. See, the Jewry doesn’t like to lose, and this is what becomes very, very scary, because they’re not willing to take their losses, go home, take their ball with them, and try again later. No, they want to stab the ball, kill their opposition, and win, no matter what it takes. And if they have to change the rules of the game to win the individual war, they’re going to do that every time.

Jeff: I talk a lot about how I feel like the West, especially the United States, well, you could throw in Canada, England, France, and Germany, they’re Weimarized. It’s just like Weimar, Germany. They have completely overrun the halls of power, the halls of government down to the state level, state houses, state governors, judges are bought left and right. And that’s exactly what they did in Germany during the Weimar, and that’s why the real German people loved Hitler because he saw that and tried to fight against it. And of course, then the Jews declared war on Germany. I mean, there were headlines. I’ve seen headlines, you know? Declaring war on Germany, declaring war on Germany, so they really went out to destroy Germany. And I feel like it’s already happening in the West. I mean, have you heard the story about that Donald Trump most likely has converted to Judaism?

Brett: Well, it was in my article. I mean, circumstantial evidence, but when you look at things like him saying, “God bless Israel,” on a nationally televised address, when you look at him arbitrarily backing up Israel with the American military to keep them from losing the war, when you see all his cabinet members are Shabbatist, and that’s the thing, Jared Kushner is a Shabbatist, that’s absolutely true. There’s no doubt about that. His daughter is a Shabbatist as well; that’s absolutely true. It has been substantiated that both of them have gone to Schneerson’s grave. That’s absolutely true.

So, and then Trump is easily manipulated, as you probably know, I was in the press corps for part of the Trump campaign at 16. I’ve seen him up close and personal. This is a man who, thanks to… because of his ego, I would argue, is extremely easily controlled by the members around him. He’s not a smart man. I don’t care what anybody says. You may have been successful to whatever degree, but he is not a smart individual, and I would advocate that he’s extremely easily controlled by the people who are much smarter than he is, using his ego. Like, obviously, right now, he wants the Nobel Prize so bad I’m surprised he doesn’t bomb Stockholm just to get one, just people aren’t on his terms alone, you know? I mean, at this point, I mean, he’s recently renamed the Gulf of Mexico, The Gulf of America.

Well, what’s next? Are we going to declare the official American religion to be Yiddish? You know, just to prove the point, I mean, this is crazy, you know? When is he gonna do something that’s actually for the American people? Many of the big, beautiful bills, when they came under the microscope, I’m not sure if you’re aware of this, there was no money for American infrastructure in them. None! Are you kidding me? America’s falling apart! But yet he couldn’t come up with that, and of course, then it was the trickle-down economics, the tax breaks, as he said, are all suddenly gonna work, the rich people are gonna put everybody to work and give back their billions of dollars and all that stuff.

It’s never gonna happen. You know, so Trump has really screwed the American people. I know the Epstein thing has been somewhat of a bellwether on that, for people to wake up, because it does beg the question, what the hell was going on with Epstein? You know, was he killed in prison? Did he hang himself? You know, was he a Mossad agent? All that. Once again, getting back to circumstantial evidence, it’s very strongly suggested that Epstein was indeed working for the Mossad, that he was running a honeypot. And he did that for so many years.

And then Bondi comes up and says, “Oh, no, we got rid of all the evidence,” and if you saw that when that took place in the press conference, Trump looks so guilty; it was ridiculous. I mean, he did himself such a disfavor in his remarks that his base was furious, you know? But now, because of that, they started focusing on the economy. They started focusing on his cabinet positions. They’re starting to focus on the Jewish element in his cabinet. You know, so once again, they can hide this to some degree, but they can’t make it go away. And people are getting disenfranchised. You look at America right now.

People ask me, well, where’s this all going? And I said, well, take a look at DC, take a look at Los Angeles. This is theater of the absurd. Trump didn’t go to Los Angeles and D.C. because there was a serious problem. He went into DC and LA to show America that he will go into any damn city that he wants to go in, anytime that there’s going to be any kind of insurrection that he’s not comfortable with. Well, most people don’t know this, but you probably do, and I think most journalists do know this, that the American State Department has its own psychologists.

They follow what’s going on… You know, they have their own economists, you know, supposedly saying… their team knows that the breaking point in America is getting closer and closer every day. And that’s accelerated by the realization of what’s taking place with the Shabbatist movement and the Zionist movement. Now they have a demon to look at as to what the cause and effect relationship is to this. But as people get more and more desperate. I mean, you’ve probably seen the studies, 60% of Americans don’t have $500 in a bank account. That’s far from an affluent society. Britain’s the same way. No one has any money. Well, they’re one disaster from being broke.

Jeff: Neither do the French.

Brett: No, no, this is a Western problem. I go to Eastern Europe when I go to Europe, because Eastern Europe has been out of the way from the Eye of Zoron for quite some time, and you can go there and have a wonderful time if you get a chance to go to Bulgaria. Give me a ring, and I will be happy to put you in touch with people. I love Bulgaria. It’s a fraction of the price of Western Europe, and it’s much better, in my view. Certainly has a few rough edges, but as you were talking about China, is it safe? Oh, completely safe. Is it a late-night town, which I like? Yes. Does it have absolutely amazing food at a fraction of the price of the West? Absolutely, you know.

But this is also using Bulgaria as an example, you could say the same thing about Romania, where I’ve been, Moldova, Georgia, you know, the list goes kind of on and on as you go down through the Black Sea region, there even sort of the middle area, like Croatia, those countries are doing much better. But they never got on to the EU bandwagon early. You know, they’re trying to be enticed into it now, later, but they’ve maintained their own currencies. They haven’t had to worry about the IMF. They haven’t taken out massive loans. I wrote a lot about Moldova when I was there during the war. They bring in Maya Sandhu, and what does she do? She immediately kowtows to the Europeans.

I was there while they were literally… the EU was there with all their muscle and might, and these huge, you know, Parades and everything else, because Moldova, as you know, is not on… in the EU just yet. And now what you have is, you know, a revolution going on in Moldova, because Sandhu just arrested the opposition leader who won the election. So you can’t even win an election anymore. But this should go back to Gaza because of the original example, a successful election being overturned by arresting all the people who won was in 2006, when Hamas came to power in Gaza.

You know, the Carter administration was there, they certified the election, and not 48 hours later, Israel started arresting every single one of the members of Hamas, which had won the election. But I cited that because now you see this all the time. Look what Trump’s done down in Brazil. He’s put a bounty on Maduro’s head. How do you justify that in the United Nations? I mean, if Putin were to put a bounty on Trump’s head, what the hell do you think would happen? It would be an international incident of biblical proportions. Yet Trump, in his own style, thinks that he can do it. I don’t know if you read the letter to Lula. I mean, how does an American president get away by addressing another head of state in that manner.

It was like watching a 6th grader send a threatening note in a bottle. I mean, it was terrible. And Lula said that, and then released the letter for everybody to read, and what did Trump come up looking like? He looked like the bombastic, selfish person that he actually is. He doesn’t have a grasp of the world body. I doubt if he can find America on a globe, quite frankly. If you see studies, most Americans can’t pointed on a globe. And these styles again become the problem, you know? So how do we change that? I’m not sure, but we have to get people to wake up and be willing to do something and understand their adversary. And that adversary right now, beyond Zionism, is Donald Trump. Not that I’m advocating Joe Biden in any way, or Obama or Bush 1 or 2, or any of those. I mean, I like to say that.

Jeff: Or Clinton.

Brett: Oh, you’re right. A lot of times, when I’m challenged, when I go after various presidents over the years that I’ve been a journalist, the first thing I say is, well, I haven’t liked a president since Lyndon Johnson, and as you probably know, I wrote a lot about Lyndon Johnson because he had what was called political capital to work with. When he wanted to get something done, he got it done because of his 32 years in Congress and 6 years in the Senate. And he was a disciple of Sam Rayburn, who believed in getting your opposition by the ball and squeeze it. But you couldn’t do that unless you had the quid pro quo; you gave something, you gave something, you gave something.

And then when you wanted something back, they had to give it to you, or they wouldn’t get another favor. If you ever have a chance to go to the Lyndon Johnson Museum, which is in Austin, Texas, there has some amazing stuff there. But one exhibit that I’d like to point people to shows the black and white picture that everyone’s probably seen. It’s in all kinds of textbooks, but it’s Johnson with his feet up on the Oval Office desk with a black phone to his ear. Most everybody’s seen this, right? And it shows that picture, the Oval Office desk is there, and there’s a plastic screen to keep you from touching anything, but they put the phone outside where you can pick it up.

And what it is, it’s a series of phone calls that Johnson was making to get the votes he needed for his Great Society, which he had to do just as much with the Democrats as he did with the Republicans. In each conversation goes something short like this. “Hello, Congressman, yes, no, this is your president talking now. No, congressman, I’m speaking. If I don’t get your vote tomorrow morning in Congress, you won’t get anything across my desk, ever, as long as I am president.” And then it’s just a click. Right? But why? Because they knew that Johnson would do that. Johnson was known for being vindictive to start with, but he had the ability to do it.

Jeff: Yeah, yeah.

Brett: Everything since Nixon really has been quid pro quo. They want something, they have to give it; they give something to get something, give something to get something. Well, the trouble with quid pro quo is that when you do that, your adversary knows that you will do it again, and we’ve seen this with Israel in spades. I mean, we gave them some F-35s not so long ago to do… I forget what it was, but Obama gave it to them. And he was trying to get them to cooperate on some international issue. And of course, they took the F-35s, and 6 months later, forgot about their promise. Probably had Nicole Nedri and went to Passover, and that was the end of that promise.

But these are the things that you’re seeing as quid pro quo. There is no political capital anymore. There is no American muscle. You know, Trump’s acting like that right now by threatening everybody, but he’s a running joke, because if you look at what he’s doing with Russia. Russia, before they went into Ukraine, had obviously very carefully looked at the likely results after the economic results, and they were ready to get off the SWIFT system. You know, they’re now doing what America’s doing, which is to try to go ethnocentric with all their production, and their finances basically bring the country back to the center of Russia.

Well, Trump says he’s trying to do that, but I think that’s a misnomer because businesses are so international now, and it’s so Zionistically approached. However, in Russia, you have another problem, and that is the Jewish element there. I’ve given up on Vladimir Putin. I thought he was going to be a check on all of this, but Syria, just 6 or 7 months ago, showed exactly where Vladimir Putin’s interests actually lie. There’s not a chance that Russia didn’t know it was going on with Turkey’s allowing the various elements of ISIS to be reconstituted, and they were moving East, you know, towards Damascus. They knew about all of that.

They’ve got a major naval base there as well. And basically, Russia just allowed Assad to swing in the breeze. And he did so because of the Zionists in his own realm of political sphere in Russia. So I don’t think we can trust Vladimir Putin at all. I do think he’s a nationalist. That’s maybe the one thing that I would say. I think a lot of countries would be much better off if they had a Vladimir Putin who did sincerely cares about their country. Once again, I’m not really as versed as you with China, but it does seem that President Xi is a nationalist. He’s surrounded by nationalists, and of course, the way their Politburo works, in my loose understanding of it, allows for that nationalism to become very, very strong.

However, in Russia, you have a nationalist, who is Putin and his cadre. And that’s all commendable; he’s taken steps to bring Russia forward very nicely. As we talked about in the sort of broadcast in the West, no, they’re just letting their nations die. And as I play devil’s advocate with many people over the years to say, well, what if you had… what if Donald Trump were like a Vladimir Putin? You know, what if Keir Starmer, or, you know, pick anyone that you want in the West? Wouldn’t your country be absolutely better if you had a nationalist who put national interests before American interests, or Zionist interests, or big business interests, or military interests?

Well, they don’t do it, they never do it, you know? The only countries that do it are in the third world; they’re usually fairly minuscule. If you look at what happened in Bolivia recently, I mean, sadly, the Conservatives will come back to power and left Iván Morales in the lurch after so long. But that was orchestrated by the Americans through Iván Morales, as you probably know, actually overthrew him, and he had to leave the country. Then there was a massive revolt over that, which brought his successor to power. But they haven’t stopped, and now they’ve put enough money in there to actually throw out the supposed socialists.

Because what you see with socialism is that America has done a great job in making socialism and communism synonymous. Now, when I say that, because there are many definitions of communism. But the American definition is the one from 1956 through 65, or whatever, that the communists are going to take over the world, they’re going to destroy the world, we’ve got to do something about communism. You know, we have to fight back against communism. I mean, they’ve done such a good job, but socialism now is synonymous with that. So no one has to say the word communism anymore; they just have to say the word socialism, and they’re cast out equally.

You know, well, what’s wrong with socialism? Look at the NHS in Britain. Annier and Devon fought tooth and Lyndon Johnson to bring the first National Social Health Service to bear in the whole world. He’s a shining example, and it has been. Now the NHS is being gutted through the techniques of Zionism. But it was a shining example of what socialism could do. If you look at, say, Norway, with its sovereign wealth fund, if you look at Denmark, if you look at Austria, they have the Social Democrat Party. And then you also have, oh, what’s the word? They’re capitalists as well. But the point I’m trying to make is that they didn’t just say, Okay, we need laissez-faire capitalism.

No, they split the baby, if you will, and they said, No, we can have capitalism, but we also have to have the social obligation, and therefore, we need an R, called regulation. We need to regulate our capitalist movement. We need to tax them appropriately. We need to make sure that they’re integral in society, and they’re paying their fair share. As you’re probably aware, General Motors used to be, or GE being even bigger, doesn’t pay hardly any taxes, because that’s the way that the game has been rigged by their lobbyists. And then they wonder why there’s no tax base for the American people. Hey, it’s gone up the tree through the 6,000 billionaires that we have.

But it’s also been taken away by there not being a tax base any longer. You know, how do you bring back a tax base that can fix your roads if you’re not going to have a tax structure that allows for that? You’re seeing this in Britain all the time, you’re seeing it in France, you’re seeing it in Germany, and then everybody scratches their head as to why there’s no money? Well, it’s a multifaceted, you know, resolution to all that. But it amounts to greed, unregulated greed, that is just allowed to self-propagate itself, in a sort of calm manner. It can just be excused away.

Jeff: Yeah, France after 1945, they called the 30 years after 1945, the Golden 30. And a lot of people don’t realize out there, out in the world, how socialist Europe was after 1945. I mean, the airlines were all national and were all people-owned. There were people who owned banks. There were all the infrastructure was people-owned. The utilities were people-owned. The hospitals were people-owned. You know, and it just goes on and on and on. People do not realize how socialist it was.

And that was when the French were the most prosperous, the happiest, the richest. And things were getting better and better and better, but as the neoliberals took over starting in the 1980s, and let’s face it, there’s a huge element of jewelry in neoliberalism. It’s a fact, and this is the Chicago school, and everybody else. And as you said, they cannot accept defeat. So they start clawing it back, and they start clawing it back, and they start clawing it back, and with deregulation, and propaganda in the media, you know, Margaret Thatcher, “There is no other way,” and Ronald Reagan, you know…

Brett: Or Sarkozy, I mean, he was a disciple of Thatcher, and we saw that in the post-Reagan era, right? Everyone gravitated to that, you know. Everyone from Gordon Brown, who gutted the Postal Service in the UK for less than par value, sold off the gold reserves at less than par value. Why? I don’t have any idea, but you know, but he did. You know, and you’ve seen that, I mean, people like David Cameron, whose claim to fame was putting his penis in a hog’s mouth while he was at Oxford. These are the kind of disgusting people that rise to power. I’m reading an interesting book called, It’s actually a fictional book; it’s by a guy named Christopher Coe.

And it’s called *Proof of My Innocence*. And it’s somewhat a fictional version, but it has a non-fictional background that he gets into, which is the advent of the conservative movement in the 1980s in England. And it’s kind of interesting because he knows his stuff about that, but he has a fictional foreground, if you will, and a non-fictional background to it. So it’s been interesting to see his premise, and I think his premise would be very much in keeping with what we’re talking about, that slow, but methodical degradation of the social obligation to the people in favor of just greed and privatization. A good example would be the trans service, which I’d have to take all the time.

When they privatize that, it’s now a joke, because before they had money for repairs and keeping it going, and all that. Oh, the trans service is abysmal. As an example, when I have to get to Heathrow from Northern Wales, I leave the day before when I could probably make it easy… no, I do, because I will probably miss my flight. But in the meantime, the train services, which are privatized, keep going back to Parliament for more money, but they don’t fix the problem. What they do is they make sure their stockholders are well taken care of. Right? Who doesn’t ride the train in the first place, and then they march on.

But I think a lot of the trouble is the people involved, because, I mean, Britain’s getting really upset, as you know, they’ve got 3 or 4 million signatures demanding a new election over there, but they tried that right after Starmer came in. As you’re probably aware, Starmer was elected as a Labor prime minister. Nothing could have been further from the truth. They actually went so far as to issue their manifesto, their labor manifesto, to entice everybody to jump on labor because everyone was sick of the conservatives, the Lib Dems never have a chance.

But I’m sorry, I’m stumbling. The manifesto lasted literally 36 hours before Starmer literally just started doing other things that weren’t in keeping with that. But he had published this. I mean, I think the Times published it, the Telegraph published it, the Mirror published it, the Mail published it, to entice everybody to jump on the labor bandwagon. Well, why? Well, because they knew that Starmer was never going to fulfill his promises, and that the British people would just go back to the pub, grouse into their beer foam, and wait for the next election, which don’t… they don’t come very often in Britain.

And it’s been a travesty. But now with Starmer applied to Zionism, this kind of goes back to what we were talking about. People are now starting to understand this, and Keir Starmer is not or does not have the British people in his heart; he is not doing what’s best for Britain. And that’s been shown again and again. But to actually print out a manifesto and then lie, or it turns out it was just nothing but a big lie, asserted a recall petition right after the election. And now it’s equal to… because if you have over 100,000 signatures, it has to be debated in Parliament.

They got 4 million. So, yeah, but keep in mind, who’s in Parliament? All the goddamn Zionists who’d started this mess in the first place that call themselves liberal or conservative, they have no voting track record of looking out for the British people themselves as well. So, I’d love to see the debate in Parliament, because it’s going to be pretty one-sided. Although I gotta say, one of the things that’s very ironic in all this is who’s come roaring back is Jeremy Corbyn. Now, I’ve lived in England for a long time, off and on.

When I bring up Corbyn, I’m a big fan of Corbyn primarily because I think he’s sincere. I think he is a socialist. If you’ve ever seen him debate in Parliament, he is brilliant, brilliant, and he has a calm demeanor; he doesn’t get ruffled, he doesn’t throw stones, and all this. He sticks with the command of his argument. Now, keep in mind that he was thrown out because he was called an anti-Semite. They wanted to get rid of him. Now, they used the anti-Semite brush to get rid of him, but they were worried about him being a true champion of socialism.

That’s what they were really scared about. But they got the dumbass British public to jump on the anti-Semitism bandwagon, and off Corbyn went about 6, 7 years ago. Well, what that actually did was certify Corbyn as being the sincere politician I thought he was. Now, keep in mind, when I brought up Corbyn’s name in bars and pubs and all that, oh my god, people looked at me like I had somebody drilled a hole in my head. He was just this… You know, they hated him, right? Well, right now, his party, which he hasn’t even launched the party.

He said, he’s going to, he has something like 4 or 5 million people that have signed on to that, and he’s got a war chest of millions of pounds because they don’t allow for private donations for the political campaigns over there. So what’s interesting, it’s very ironic that Corbyn has now come back full circle, primarily because people feel they can trust him. That’s the big issue. They feel they trusted to fulfill his promises if he’s elected. Great! Now, name another politician worldwide that you put your faith in. Go ahead, maybe in a third-world country, but try in the first world. Can you think of one?

Jeff: Not in the first world. Well, yeah, China, Ibrahim Traoré in Burkina Faso, the Sahel, the Sahel countries. Those guys are working for the people. But they’re people… North Korea, Kim, Vietnam, To Lam, I think it’s… How you pronounce his name, Premier To Lam. Those kinds of people, I think, the leader of Cuba is trying to help his people. But they’re all socialist. I mean, basically, they’re all socialist countries.

Brett: Well, they haven’t prostituted their conscience. Yeah, they’re still socialists because they haven’t thrown it out by being told to throw it out; they haven’t made it synonymous with communism. You know, and this is the crazy part, but as I said earlier, I think people are waking up to this. This is what a lot of my articles are trying to get people to understand the full breadth of Zionism so that they can understand the full breadth of that threat, applied to their own… Self-preservation is maybe the best way to put that, looking out for their children, your wives, their grandkids, whatever it is, because certainly Donald Trump’s not doing it. And certainly the American Congress isn’t.

Jeff: Yeah. That’s for sure. That’s a corporation. The Congress is a corporation.

Brett: Yeah, we probably know about this study. I talked to Kevin Barrett about this because he did his time up there in Madison, and the report was issued by University of Madison, Wisconsin, and Princeton University, and it’s a little bit of an old report, but they went back for a 10-year period and looked at all signed legislation in America over, like, about a 10-year period. And what they found was that… I’m slightly paraphrasing here; it was something like 85% of all legislation had no direct benefit to the American people whatsoever unless you believe in trickle-down economics. Okay, the next thing was that it was something like 93% violated the American will on the issues; this really violated what Americans would have done if they’d been allowed to weigh in on the various legislations as well. So now you’re in the realm of 85% to 90% of legislation doesn’t help the American people at all. And that’s the story’s about 10 years old now. It’s obviously only gotten worse.

Jeff: Or much, much worse.

Brett: Yeah, so but people have to understand that’s what I say, I mean, I think Trump and his ilk know that the breaking point is very near now. And this is why you’re seeing the troop movements now, I mean, in Los Angeles, it wasn’t just the National Guard where he overshot Gavin Newsom and just ordered the National Guard out, which is his purview. No, he sent in the military; he sent in the army, you know, just to bolster the whole thing, to show that he’s capable and willing to do that, you know? And there will come a time, as it was in about 1936 in Nazi Germany, where there’ll be a kind of Reichstag moment, and Trump will therefore pull out his executive orders, because I think at this point he’s had more executive orders than any president in history.

He loves it because it puts his name on everything. But I don’t think he’s going to stop there, because he’s going to be told what to do, and he’s gonna put the American people in their place. And their place is to do as they’re told, apparently, and not to rise up and look out for their families. Their lot in life is to be impoverished, not have $500 in their bank account, and like it. Well, pretty soon people aren’t gonna like that, and that’s when the Second Amendment’s gonna come to full fruition is that, you know… Well, likely so. That’s why it was there. I mean, let’s ask our founding fathers why they put it there, you know? It was very deliberate, you know. So anyway, it’s very sad, and I find myself divorcing myself from America more and more.

He’s one of the reasons I’m in New Orleans right now. This is very much a cultural experience down here. There’s a lot less racism in this town. I mean, it’s predominantly an African-American town, but African Americans don’t look at me like they’re gonna just haul off and hit me because I’m a white person, at all. It’s just not that way down here. Black and white have existed side by side for centuries; they still do. You know, it’s nice. Then you have the music scene, and the art scene, and all that that goes hand-in-hand. I’m not suggesting there isn’t some animosity here, but, like, in San Diego right now? Oh, no! I mean, you can see the vicious hatred in Black people’s eyes when they look at a white person such as myself, and I do, I look like a white Anglo-Saxon Protestant.

What they don’t know is that my great-grandfather was actually full Black, and it was as black as the blackest person you’ve ever seen. It’s another long story. Basically, I have a lot of cream in my coffee, because he was from the Virgin Islands. And in the Virgin Islands, they overthrew the white men at a very early stage, about 1823. And what they did, they were very smart, you see, they killed all the white men, and they kept all the white women. So I am the result of that, you know? So you talk about rising up and taking care of Zionism. Well, I guess you could say the slave traders were sort of the original Zionists; there’s nothing along those lines.

Jeff: That’s another thing I discovered in my library on Judaism is the vast majority of slave trading was done by Jews.

Brett: Yes.

Jeff: It’s just every time I would just find something, I’m just like, this can’t be true. I’m 71 years old! And I am finding this out now? I was shocked. I was just shocked and disgusted.

Brett: Well, we both know Ron Unz, and one of the things that he’s done over the years, which I greatly respect, is he’s brought back the ability to find so much works of these great journalists from the past, who were literally, you know… rifled, deliberately. I mean, as Ron talks about this, you probably know it; most people don’t know this, but it’s absolutely very true. The controversial journalists of our time went through the archives of libraries and told their work, they got rid of it, they got similar to what they tried to do to David Irving, but in a different manner.

But no, so Ron went took the time to revisit revisionist history, because that’s really what was going on. But this is why so often, including you and many others, are surprised at what the real truth is. What I like to think is that’s what historians are supposed to do. Certainly, in the short term, we have to live with the narrative of what that is, but assuming we’re smart enough people to read between the lines of what good historians present to us, we can now see what the truth actually is. Look at the Second World War.

This is why Shire’s book is not considered that good at this point, written in 1963, and Irving’s book, in my mind, is much, much better. I mean, Irving’s… Geez, what an incredible mind, what an incredible writer, what an incredible researcher and what an honest man. But his book, I believe, was in 1983, so that’s 20 years post Shire’s book. And then 20 years’ worth of research, because as you probably know, Irving went through Himmler’s diary, Hitler’s diary. I mean, he was all over the world pulling stuff out of the archives. So he’s done what Ron did, which is basically bring back the real story of the Second World War.

I think what got him in trouble with a worldwide Jewry was that, along the way, he was open-minded about the Holocaust and did his own research and indicated very strongly that there wasn’t necessarily a Holocaust.. There was the use of the Jewish population for the war effort; lots of people did, in fact, die, but the demonization in Irving’s book is put on Himmler, not on Hitler himself. Hitler was much more pragmatic, and it’s right there in chapter and verse. Hitler, as much as he wanted to incarcerate the Jews, knew that he had a workforce, and there was no point in assassinating or killing his entire workforce. We need to keep them alive.

And apparently, Hitler was viciously mad at Himmler, because Himmler did go to that next level, he did indeed dig trenches, he did indeed, you know, kill many people with bullets to the back of the head through his troops, and there was the SS mentality that he propagated, etc. That’s all absolutely true. But the boogeyman, Hitler, was very much like a Saddam Hussein or a Gaddafi, or whatever. He was the point man for the vilification of an ideology. And Hitler became that, and they didn’t want to see that change, because the public was receptive to the one name. Not everybody… well, most people do know the name Himmler, but they don’t know much about him.

But if God knows how many movies have been out there about demonizing Hitler properly, of course, but to create a misrepresentation of what the historical truth actually was. And I think that’s really why Irving got himself in trouble, and if you read what Irving has had to say about the way the worldwide Jewry went after him, it was horrifying. It was really, really bad. I mean, they basically put him in a Target, and they went after him with hammering tongs. And then, sadly, Irving decided to defend himself in court, which is an old adage, you know.

Anyone who represents themselves in court has a fool for an attorney. I actually approached Irvin for an interview on that issue because I’ve represented myself in court. I wanted to see why he did it. I did… he very kindly did respond, just in the sense that he was not interested in the interview and thanked me for my time and was very courteous about that. Rana’s, he’s about 87 now. He’s very old now, so it was understandable. I hold no animosity towards David Van Irving at all. In fact, I was very pleased that he did, in fact, respond. But I was on his side, the truth is the truth; he took the time to do all that amazing work, and because of that, he fell afoul of the Jewish narrative.

Jeff: Yeah, absolutely. Well, this has been an amazing conversation, Brett.

Brett: Likewise, Jeff.

Jeff: We’ll have to do this more often. I just checked… I wrote it down somewhere, where was it? Anyway, the last time we had… We were together on the show in 2022, so that’s way too long, so we’ll have to do… I’ll have to put it in my Outlook calendar to contact you more often to get us together, because we always have wonderful conversations. This is our third show, and I’ve also published a number of your works on my website, and for those of you out there who want to learn more about Brett, I will put his website. It’s “Watching Rome Burn,” just glue together “WatchingRomeBurn.com”

Brett: That’s actually “.uk”. https://watchingromeburn.uk

Jeff: Oh, .uk. Yeah, that’s right. Yeah, I noticed that, yeah, you’re right. And I will also put his email. I always enjoyed talking to him. We do stay in semi-regular touch. We do stay in touch. And we got started. I noticed… where was it? I wrote the… oh yeah. I found that when you and I got connected together in November of 2020, because you wrote an article about the scam election with Trump in 2020, and you know how it was a robbery. And I reached out to you, and I don’t know how I found your article, but anyway… somebody sent me your article, and I thought, this is… I can’t believe this, and so Brett inspired me.

And he and I were practically about the only two journalists who were really… That and the *Epoch Times*, you have to give *Epoch Times* credit. They actually did a great job covering the fraudulent elections of 2020. And so Brett and I went on a chair, and he was writing articles about the election, the fraud, the stolen elections, and I was writing articles. And now all of his stuff and my stuff, and *Epoch Times*, as much as I hold my nose with *Epoch Times*, because they’re Falungong, but they did do a great, great job with the election. We have to admit it.

Brett: Sure.

Jeff: They were the only major outlet that was even trying to talk about how the elections were stolen. But anyway, and I put that, and now I have an election library, so all your stuff that you wrote, and my stuff that I wrote, that *Epoch Times* run, I’ve got it all collected together in a… and then you and I both were just so fed up when the Democrats Shanghai the election certification in Congress with… on January 6th, that was all. That wasn’t Trump; that was the Democrats who did it. They didn’t want the vote to happen. And anyway, so that’s when we met with… So we’ve known each other now for almost 5 years. And so we’ll have to get you back on sooner than 2028.

Brett: It’s always a pleasure, Jeff, and you know, especially from the standpoint of we’re providing information to you, I, Kevin Barrett, there’s not… I mean, there’s obviously a long list, but the list is not long enough of journalists who are doing… basically, when I talk about David Irving, we tend to produce our work that can be substantiated. You know, I can debate anybody on my work. I’d be happy to do it, you know. So I fall in the category of sort of being a journalist historian, and you fall into that category, Kevin does, and some others as well, but we’re a tiny little subset of the whole.

I think we’re gaining popularity as a collective group because people, once again, are waking up to who they can trust. If they can trust Jeremy Corbyn, you know, what can they trust Jeff Brown or Brett Red Redmayne Titley, or whomever, if they’re predisposed to do so. But people are hungry for something they can they can grab. Your work is exemplary. Look at Pepe Escobar, who’s done great, great work. I quoted him in my last piece. If you do me a favor and send that piece to Pepe, that’d be great. I’d love to hear from him. But there you are. So, no, I’m always glad to talk with you and the others, because journalism is a rather isolating proposition to be in.

I don’t have a lot of journalism friends, or at least people that I can call friends like yourself. So when I get a chance to speak at length with someone like yourself, it’s extremely rewarding for me. You know, I can spend a lot of time talking to people who just may not know what they’re talking about, or maybe they’re receptive, but it is nice to talk to a colleague and bounce things back and forth, and allow the readers to discern what we’re talking about, you know? You’re good at bouncing things back and forth. Certainly, Kevin’s the same way. He’ll challenge me, no problem whatsoever, and I respect that. I would rather have someone challenge me than just accept what I say.

Hopefully, by extension, your listeners and readers are starting to take that tactic as well and develop cognizant dissonance and figure out what’s really going on in the world, you know, before it’s too late, because we are in a war, I would say, to rectify the constant of conscience that I quote a lot, and the way we do that is by the first rule of democracy, which I’ve quoted many times in my work. You know, there are more of us than there are of them, and we will always win, because we are the majority. We are the conscience, and we are the majority, and we have to just put our weight behind that conscience, one way or another, get the politicians out, get people to wake up, and to change this world for the better and bring it back to where it used to be.

Jeff: Yeah, absolutely. Well, Brett, thank you very much. This has been wonderful. I will turn this off. And before I turn this off, I will give you a respectful Buddhist bow. You’re a Daoist, I’m a Buddhist, but you go into a temple in mainland China or the Taiwan province, they’re very syncretic, it’s Daoist, Confucian, and Buddhist all mixed together, so I see Daoism every day in temples around where we live here. I will turn this off. Thank you very much.

###

IMPORTANT NOTICE: techofascism is already here! I’ve been de-platformed by StumbleUpon (now Mix) and Reddit. I am being heavily censored by Facebook, Instagram, Quora, SoundCloud, Substack, TikTok, X and can no longer use StumbleUpon/Mix, Tumblr and YouTube. It’s only a matter of time before they de-platform me too. Please start using Brighteon for my videos, then connect with me via other social media listed below, especially VK, Telegram, Gettr, Gab and WeChat, which are not part of the West’s Big Lie Propaganda Machine (BLPM).

Daily news: https://twitter.com/44_Days

Daily news: https://t.me/jeffjbrown

I also write shorter pieces on Seek Truth From Facts,

https://seektruthfromfacts.org/category/cwg/

And edit STFF’s Guest Submissions,

https://seektruthfromfacts.org/guess-submissions/

Also, sign up for my FREE email newsletter…

Support, donations and contributions for my work here, any amount, one time or monthly,

A to Z support. Thank you in advance, Jeff

Checks or cash: mail to: Jeff J. Brown, 7 rue du Général de Gaulle, Équeurdreville 50120, France

Donorbox: www.donorbox.com, find China Rising Radio Sinoland

Euro bank wires: 44 Days Publishing, Bank: TransferWise, IBAN: BE70 9672 2959 5225

FundRazr: https://fundrazr.com/CRRS_2021_fundraiser?ref=ab_78aX23

Patreon: https://www.patreon.com/China_Rising_Radio_Sinoland OR https://www.patreon.com/China_Tech_News_Flash

Paypal: https://www.paypal.me/ChinaRisingRadioSino

Stripe US$/ApplePay: https://buy.stripe.com/14k8zl5tp5mVeT66op

Stripe Euros/ApplePay: https://buy.stripe.com/fZe02P8FB9DbcKY28a

US bank wires: Jeff J. Brown, Bank of Oklahoma, Routing Number/ABA: 103900036, Account: 309163695

WeChat and Alipay:

Do yourself, your friends, family and colleagues a favor, to make sure all of you are Sino-smart: 

Google ebooks (Epub) and audiobooks:

44 Days Backpacking in China: The Middle Kingdom in the 21st Century, with the United States, Europe and the Fate of the World in Its Looking Glass https://play.google.com/store/books/details?id=YBKHEAAAQBAJ

https://play.google.com/store/audiobooks/details?id=AQAAAECCkQXRlM

China Rising: Capitalist Roads, Socialist Destinations https://play.google.com/store/books/details?id=YNmLEAAAQBAJ

https://play.google.com/store/audiobooks/details?id=AQAAAECCfHo86M

BIG Red Book on China: Chinese History, Culture and Revolution

https://play.google.com/store/books/details?id=6Wl4EAAAQBAJ

https://play.google.com/store/audiobooks/details?id=AQAAAECCfHo86M

Amazon print and ebooks (Kindle):

44 Days Backpacking in China: The Middle Kingdom in the 21st Century, with the United States, Europe and the Fate of the World in Its Looking Glass

https://www.amazon.com/gp/product/1484939999/

China Rising: Capitalist Roads, Socialist Destinations

https://www.amazon.com/China-Rising-Capitalist-Socialist-Destinations/dp/0996487042

BIG Red Book on China: Chinese History, Culture and Revolution

https://www.amazon.com/BIG-Red-Book-China/dp/1673322719/

Author page:

https://www.amazon.com/Mr.-Jeff-J.-Brown/e/B00TX0TDDI

Praise for The China Trilogy:

https://radiosinoland.com/2018/06/30/praise-for-the-china-trilogy-the-votes-are-in-it-r-o-c-k-s-what-are-you-waiting-for/

Why and How China works: With a Mirror to Our Own History

44 Days Backpacking in China: The Middle Kingdom in the 21st Century, with the United States, Europe and the Fate of the World in Its Looking Glass

China Rising: Capitalist Roads, Socialist Destinations

 

 

 

 

 

 

BIG Red Book on China: Chinese History, Culture and Revolution

ABOUT JEFF BROWN

JEFF J. BROWN, Editor, China Rising, and Senior Editor & China Correspondent, Dispatch from Beijing, The Greanville Post

Jeff J. Brown is a geopolitical analyst, journalist, lecturer and the author of The China Trilogy. It consists of 44 Days Backpacking in China – The Middle Kingdom in the 21st Century, with the United States, Europe and the Fate of the World in Its Looking Glass (2013); Punto Press released China Rising – Capitalist Roads, Socialist Destinations (2016); and BIG Red Book on China (2020). As well, he published a textbook, Doctor WriteRead’s Treasure Trove to Great English (2015). Jeff is a Senior Editor & China Correspondent for The Greanville Post, where he keeps a column, Dispatch from Beijing and is a Global Opinion Leader at 21^st Century. He also writes a column for The Saker, called the Moscow-Beijing Express. Jeff writes, interviews and podcasts on his own program, China Rising Radio Sinoland, which is also available on YouTube, Stitcher Radio, iTunes, Ivoox and RUvid. Guests have included Ramsey Clark, James Bradley, Moti Nissani, Godfree Roberts, Hiroyuki Hamada, The Saker and many others. [/su_spoiler]

Jeff can be reached at China Rising, je**@***********is.com, Facebook, Twitter, Wechat (+86-19806711824/Mr_Professor_Brown, and Line/Telegram/Whatsapp: +33-612458821.