Chinese thinker compares Eastern and Western Thought. It will definitely ruffle some feathers! Sino-social media is full of philosophers like this. Radio Sinoland 250908

TRANSLATION MENU: LOOK UPPER RIGHT BELOW THE SOCIAL MEDIA ICONS.

IT OFFERS EVERY LANGUAGE AVAILABLE AROUND THE WORLD!

ALSO, SOCIAL MEDIA AND PRINT ICONS ARE AT THE BOTTOM OF THIS POST!

Pictured above: yes, Confucius and Laozi (of the Dao fame) really did meet, circa 5th century BC. A while later, Laozi orally recited the Dao to a colleague, who wrote it all down, whose propagation has profoundly changed world philosophy for the better. Laozi then got on his donkey, took off for the mountains and was never heard from again! Meanwhile, Confucius continued to battle against bad guys in government and society, until his death.


Sixteen years on the streets, living and working with the people of China, Jeff

For donations, print books, ebooks and audiobooks, please see at the bottom of this post.

Essay

Original Chinese: https://mp.weixin.qq.com/s/XajA60aZ4ZBKP2vXZyIFdA (more recommended reading at the end)

English translation

Christians, Teach Yourselves 

Yesterday’s article — “Who Is Closer to Faith: Laozi or Confucius?” — was, as expected, not recommended by the algorithm, resulting in extremely low readership. However, I received one private message in response — over 2,000 words long.

Judging by its tone, it was written by a Christian, addressed to Yang Peng, attempting to encourage him and rationalize his Christian stance.

I actually believe Yang Peng is a decent person — at the very least, he is not one of those “Western History Fundamentalists,” nor is he an orthodox Christian suffering from what I call “Bible-itis.” I suspect he is, like I was several years ago, a “cultural Christian.” His tendency to tie everything he discusses back to “God” or similar concepts reflects, I think, the same impulse I once had — to anchor an ideal social order in an eternal, supreme source.

But I must refute him — precisely because I sense he, like my former self, is sincerely doing harm: leading countless people, especially intellectuals, down the wrong path, all under the delusion of good intentions.

Below, I’ll respond to this private message paragraph by paragraph.

Before replying, let me first introduce a concept from physics — wave-particle duality.

The world is composed of fundamental particles, yet wave-particle duality experiments reveal this: particles do not fundamentally exist. They are originally formless, intangible waves. Only when human consciousness intervenes does the wave function collapse, forming what we perceive as particles. In other words, without human consciousness, the so-called “world” is formless and intangible.

A formless, intangible world is naturally without good or evil, without love or hate, without birth or death, without purity or defilement, without increase or decrease. Concepts like “piety,” “pride,” “grace,” “redemption,” “finitude,” or “dependence” simply do not apply. It is precisely human consciousness — with all its conceptual interference — that collapses the originally pure, formless, eternal, and infinite into the chaotic, material world we call “the mortal realm.”

Now, onto the main text.

Author “Why This Life”: Epistemologically, he treats “inner intuitive certainty” as the source of truth, lacking any publicly verifiable or correctable pathway.

“Inner intuition” refers to Laozi’s phrase: “Attain the utmost emptiness; hold fast to profound stillness. All things arise together, yet each returns to its root.” This state Laozi describes is essentially one where human consciousness does not interfere — in quantum terms, it avoids wave function collapse, preserving the wave’s original state: undefiled, unborn, undying, unchanging. This is not the “source” of truth — it is truth itself. Add even the slightest conceptual overlay, and it is no longer truth.

Ontologically, he equates “self-nature” with “self-existent and eternal,” essentially anthropomorphizing divinity (deifying the created human mind), which contradicts the evident finitude and dependence of human reality.

“Self-nature” is Huineng’s term — essentially the same mental state Laozi describes as “attaining emptiness and holding stillness.” This state — unborn, undying, undefiled, unchanging — is what religious believers mythologize as the “state of God.” As for “finitude and dependence in reality,” these are obsessions held by religious adherents and ordinary people alike. Such fixations only deepen the chaos of the “particle-world” — the material realm.

Ethically, he devalues “faith” and “revelation,” thereby evading the public visibility of love and grace (love as responsibility toward the other; grace as reaching out toward sin and suffering). His system thus resembles an “inner cultivation self-salvation technique,” rather than a “law of love” capable of producing publicly observable fruits in the shared world.

“Faith” is the misuse of ordinary people’s innate desire for goodness. Shenxiu’s famous line — “The body is the Bodhi tree” — exemplifies the mindset of “faith.” “Revelation,” meanwhile, is a kind of spiritual illness born of unfulfilled longing and self-suggestion. “Love and grace” are spiritual subprime crises — distortions that arise after human consciousness collapses the truth-wave into particles, then misinterprets and propagates these distortions.

Comparison with Christian Truth Order (Key Points of Victory/Defeat)

1) Truth and Freedom: How to attain? How to correct?

Author’s approach: Inner intuition = truth. Problem: It is neither falsifiable nor shareable — if you claim “I am inherently complete,” why should others agree? When two “self-realized sages” disagree, who adjudicates?

When several believers all claim to be “filled with the Holy Spirit,” how do you falsify that? How do you share it (aside from psychiatric self-suggestion)? Who adjudicates (aside from the pastor collecting tithes)?

Christian principle: Truth transcends the individual (not determined by personal will) yet can be witnessed and tested within history and community — “You will know the truth, and the truth will set you free.” Revelation and reason, conscience and community, mutually correct each other, forming a verifiable, self-correcting epistemology.

This so-called “Christian principle” is merely the misuse of ordinary people’s desire for goodness. Shenxiu’s “The body is the Bodhi tree” represents the realm of faith; “revelation” is a spiritual illness born of unfulfilled longing and self-suggestion. “The true God has no form; self-nature is inherently complete. Chanting ‘Amen’ through sights and sounds — clinging to delusion, never awakening.”

Victory: The Christian principle wins on “public verifiability” and “corrective mechanisms.” The author’s approach easily slides into incommunicable monologue or “spiritual aristocracy.”

This so-called “communicable” Christian principle is merely a collectively induced spiritual illness. “Love and grace” are spiritual subprime crises — distortions arising after human consciousness collapses the truth-wave into particles, then misinterprets and propagates these distortions.

2) Ontology: Who is “self-existent and eternal”?

Author asserts: Human “self-nature” is self-existent and eternal.

Logical conflict: Human birth, growth, aging, cognitive development, and decline after injury all manifest dependence and finitude.

Only after ordinary consciousness collapses waves into particles do “human bodies” and “the world” appear — along with dependence and finitude. Believers obsess over and debate the “particle-world,” while yearning for the “wave-world” (the divine), yet they never find the gate — instead, their self-righteous piety leads them further astray.

Causal inquiry: If “self-nature is self-existent,” why do humans experience ignorance, require learning, and undergo change? In classical theology, “self-existent and eternal” exclusively describes the uncreated, self-sufficient God. Applying it to finite minds is a categorical error.

Answer: Same as above.

Christian principle: The Creator-creature distinction preserves human dignity (made in God’s image) and human limitation (requiring truth and grace).

The concept of “Creator” is the most stubborn and delusional form of idolatry. “God is spirit; worship Him in spirit.” Yet not a single believer has ever seriously contemplated: What is “spirit”?

Victory: Christian ontology is more coherent. The author’s deification of humanity simultaneously elevates humans beyond verification and hollows out moral responsibility (if “I am inherently pure,” whence comes evil?).

The prohibition against idolatry is perhaps this religion’s most valuable insight — tragically, in practice, it completely cuts off believers from walking this righteous path. They fail to realize that “God,” “Scripture,” “Lord” — these concepts themselves are the most stubborn “idols.”

3) Ethics: Can love and grace be “visible”?

The author devalues language and revelation, emphasizing “inner verification.” Ethically, this easily degenerates into private cultivation. The maxim “All things are complete within me” lacks external constraint regarding “the suffering of others” (if I am already complete, why must I humble myself to serve?).

Anyone who understands even slightly Wang Yangming’s lines — “No good, no evil — the mind’s essence; Good and evil arise with intention; Knowing good and evil is conscience; Doing good and removing evil is investigation of things” — would never say, “If I am already complete, why must I humble myself to serve?”

Christian principle: Love and grace must externalize into publicly visible actions (healing, forgiveness, mercy, compassion, charity, sacrifice) and be subject to communal witness and historical verification (“By their fruits you shall know them”). Christian ethics triumphs in being “other-centered,” “historically visible,” and “communally verifiable.” Inner, solitary cultivation rarely generates verifiable public good.

It is only after ordinary consciousness collapses waves into particles that concepts like “healing, forgiveness, mercy, compassion, charity, sacrifice” arise — all of them, frankly, obsessive constructs. Believers obsess over and debate the “particle-world,” while yearning for the “wave-world” (the divine), yet they never find the gate — instead, their self-righteous piety leads them further astray.

There is much more to come, but essentially all of it consists of obsessive notions confined within the “particle-world,” all answerable by the paragraph above.

Actually, the “Bible” contains several worthwhile insights — for example: “Do not worship idols”; “God is spirit; worship Him in spirit”; “Render unto Caesar what is Caesar’s, and unto God what is God’s”; the Ten Commandments. But these precious insights are drowned in oceans of supernatural superstition, so that nearly all believers become self-righteous people walking crooked paths.

Rather than scold them uselessly, I offer Wang Yangming’s Four-Line Teaching for the intelligent believer to contemplate:

No good, no evil — the mind’s essence (the divine realm)

Good and evil arise with intention (discriminating good and evil)

Knowing good and evil is conscience (Ten Commandments, Eight Beatitudes)

Doing good and removing evil is investigation of things (holy living)

Believers, if you wish to verify this, it’s simple: Sit quietly with closed eyes for half an hour. As long as you don’t fall asleep, you will inevitably glimpse what is truly the “Way, the Truth, and the Life.” Though you may only glimpse it, you will have seen the entrance to the “narrow gate” — incomparably different from your usual spiritual babble.

Recommended Reading (previous essays):

Note: this writer is very knowledgeable about Western philosophy, including Judaism (https://radiosinoland.com/2025/01/23/judaism/). To read from this list, open each one, Copy+ALL the text and paste into your favorite AI engine, asking for it to be translated into your preferred language. All of his works are quite thought provoking!

What Is “The West”? https://mp.weixin.qq.com/s?__biz=MzkxOTY4OTI1OQ==&mid=2247491315&idx=1&sn=a05f912096e16f9c47a36cf543e1c43f&scene=21&poc_token=HD0LvWij4srT_N-SdAov_pJ5f4gzjDAZncyTFynK

Hayek and the Grassroots https://mp.weixin.qq.com/s?__biz=MzkxOTY4OTI1OQ==&mid=2247491292&idx=1&sn=56c16aa8146359b9a9231397eb436fe3&scene=21&poc_token=HH0LvWijBc5J5yjB9ydmsKPCV8J0p-0XHAbLl4zV

“Western History Fundamentalism” Is a Sign of Ignorance https://mp.weixin.qq.com/s?__biz=MzkxOTY4OTI1OQ==&mid=2247491155&idx=1&sn=3aba83ac5acad2692808cbd5e3e6e7e7&scene=21&poc_token=HMULvWijnsoFqI7tXM28xjUiI8gGHmSIUErexoYt

Modern Civilization Is Jewish in Spirit: https://mp.weixin.qq.com/s?__biz=MzkxOTY4OTI1OQ==&mid=2247490857&idx=1&sn=548be615b5b156146a58d61ffe8cbbde&scene=21&poc_token=HOEKvWijLBJhy2t7RhC_zBj-DQjaWkGREAJVtiUe 

Max Weber Is a Snake https://mp.weixin.qq.com/s?__biz=MzkxOTY4OTI1OQ==&mid=2247490735&idx=1&sn=e09f94182b30fe234cab73517063581f&scene=21&poc_token=HBAMvWijj553o3Uoykz98gLG2O_YPJXRpbKhQjfc

 

###

IMPORTANT NOTICE: techofascism is already here! I’ve been de-platformed by StumbleUpon (now Mix) and Reddit. I am being heavily censored by Facebook, Instagram, Quora, SoundCloud, Substack, TikTok, X and can no longer use StumbleUpon/Mix, Tumblr and YouTube. It’s only a matter of time before they de-platform me too. Please start using Brighteon for my videos, then connect with me via other social media listed below, especially VK, Telegram, Gettr, Gab and WeChat, which are not part of the West’s Big Lie Propaganda Machine (BLPM).

I will post EVERYTHING I produce on my Twitter and Telegram channels, including useful news and information you may not come across, so subscribe for FREE, for the most frequent updates,

Daily news: https://twitter.com/44_Days

Daily news: https://t.me/jeffjbrown

I also write shorter pieces on Seek Truth From Facts,

https://seektruthfromfacts.org/category/cwg/

And edit STFF’s Guest Submissions,

https://seektruthfromfacts.org/guess-submissions/

 

Also, sign up for my FREE email newsletter…

Support, donations and contributions for my work here, any amount, one time or monthly,

A to Z support. Thank you in advance, Jeff

Checks or cash: mail to: Jeff J. Brown, 7 rue du Général de Gaulle, Équeurdreville 50120, France

Donorbox: www.donorbox.com, find China Rising Radio Sinoland

Euro bank wires: 44 Days Publishing, Bank: TransferWise, IBAN: BE70 9672 2959 5225

FundRazr: https://fundrazr.com/CRRS_2021_fundraiser?ref=ab_78aX23

Patreon: https://www.patreon.com/China_Rising_Radio_Sinoland OR https://www.patreon.com/China_Tech_News_Flash

Paypal: https://www.paypal.me/ChinaRisingRadioSino

Stripe US$/ApplePay: https://buy.stripe.com/14k8zl5tp5mVeT66op

Stripe Euros/ApplePay: https://buy.stripe.com/fZe02P8FB9DbcKY28a

US bank wires: Jeff J. Brown, Bank of Oklahoma, Routing Number/ABA: 103900036, Account: 309163695

WeChat and Alipay:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Do yourself, your friends, family and colleagues a favor, to make sure all of you are Sino-smart: 

Google ebooks (Epub) and audiobooks:

44 Days Backpacking in China: The Middle Kingdom in the 21st Century, with the United States, Europe and the Fate of the World in Its Looking Glass https://play.google.com/store/books/details?id=YBKHEAAAQBAJ

https://play.google.com/store/audiobooks/details?id=AQAAAECCkQXRlM

China Rising: Capitalist Roads, Socialist Destinations https://play.google.com/store/books/details?id=YNmLEAAAQBAJ

https://play.google.com/store/audiobooks/details?id=AQAAAECCfHo86M

BIG Red Book on China: Chinese History, Culture and Revolution

https://play.google.com/store/books/details?id=6Wl4EAAAQBAJ

https://play.google.com/store/audiobooks/details?id=AQAAAECCfHo86M

Amazon print and ebooks (Kindle):

44 Days Backpacking in China: The Middle Kingdom in the 21st Century, with the United States, Europe and the Fate of the World in Its Looking Glass

https://www.amazon.com/gp/product/1484939999/

China Rising: Capitalist Roads, Socialist Destinations

https://www.amazon.com/China-Rising-Capitalist-Socialist-Destinations/dp/0996487042

BIG Red Book on China: Chinese History, Culture and Revolution

https://www.amazon.com/BIG-Red-Book-China/dp/1673322719/

Author page:

https://www.amazon.com/Mr.-Jeff-J.-Brown/e/B00TX0TDDI

Praise for The China Trilogy:

https://radiosinoland.com/2018/06/30/praise-for-the-china-trilogy-the-votes-are-in-it-r-o-c-k-s-what-are-you-waiting-for/

 

Why and How China works: With a Mirror to Our Own History


ABOUT JEFF BROWN

jeffBusyatDesktop

JEFF J. BROWN, Editor, China Rising, and Senior Editor & China Correspondent, Dispatch from Beijing, The Greanville Post

Jeff J. Brown is a geopolitical analyst, journalist, lecturer and the author of The China Trilogy. It consists of 44 Days Backpacking in China – The Middle Kingdom in the 21st Century, with the United States, Europe and the Fate of the World in Its Looking Glass (2013); Punto Press released China Rising – Capitalist Roads, Socialist Destinations (2016); and BIG Red Book on China (2020). As well, he published a textbook, Doctor WriteRead’s Treasure Trove to Great English (2015). Jeff is a Senior Editor & China Correspondent for The Greanville Post, where he keeps a column, Dispatch from Beijing and is a Global Opinion Leader at 21st Century. He also writes a column for The Saker, called the Moscow-Beijing Express. Jeff writes, interviews and podcasts on his own program, China Rising Radio Sinoland, which is also available on YouTubeStitcher Radio, iTunes, Ivoox and RUvid. Guests have included Ramsey Clark, James Bradley, Moti Nissani, Godfree Roberts, Hiroyuki Hamada, The Saker and many others. [/su_spoiler]

Jeff can be reached at China Rising, je**@***********is.com, Facebook, Twitter, Wechat (+86-19806711824/Mr_Professor_Brown, and Line/Telegram/Whatsapp: +33-612458821.

Read it in your language • Lealo en su idioma • Lisez-le dans votre langue • Lies es in deniner Sprache • Прочитайте это на вашем языке • 用你的语言阅读

[google-translator]

 

Wechat group: search the phone number +8619806711824 or my ID, Mr_Professor_Brown, friend request and ask Jeff to join the China Rising Radio Sinoland Wechat group. He will add you as a member, so you can join in the ongoing discussion.

The buck stops with YOU. If you don't share this, who will?